9 August 2011,
UBAZ 3016 Research Methodology and Project
Time: 12.30p.m. ~ 2.00p.m.
Group members: Me, Dan tart, Hiko , yeeluan & siewboon~^^
Presentation of FYP proposal....^^
Our topic: Factors determining consumers' purchasing behavior
towards pirated media in Malaysia
p/s: the topic looks like no related to our course,right? hehe=p
Our presentation considers good
since teacher didn't ask many question at that time,
just reminded us to put the arrow on the proposed conceptual framework diagram.
Our tutor,
Mr.Krishna is a good teacher,
kind, helpful, patient and tender~^^
Thanks to him who gives us so many advice~^^
Now,
let's enjoys some of photos that were captured after our presentation.^^
Tall & black shirt's guy: Hiko
Black shirt's girl: yeeluan
Long hair & grey shirt's girl: siewboon
White shirt's girl: me
A weird face guy: Dan tart
* Thanks to lingsiaw who helped us to take these photos~^^
Yea,
finally we finished our presentation of proposal,
next round,
frighting for our VIVA presentation on next next semester,
Our group's target: B+
remember ''Success come in cans, not cant's''~
Self confidence is the key to the universe,
so my dear members,
If you think you can, you can~
and
Confidence is preparation. Everything else is beyond your control
haha....so start our journey to VIVA from now~keke=p (kidding)
I love you all, my friendz~^^♥♥♥
10 August 2011,
The first debate in my life,
we need to argue over the topics given by teacher,
there are 2 debates for us in 1 day,
1st round: prescriptive approach to the issues of corporate governance
is a better approach compare to non-prescriptive approach.
Actually prescriptive approach is mostly referred to SOX (Sarbanes Oxley Act)
and non-prescriptive approaches are mostly referred to UKCC and MCCG.
Our team supported that prescriptive approach is better approach in CG.
and the result not bad^^
can consider as tie~
2nd round: Minority shareholders activism is effective in advancing
shareholders interest and instituting sound corporate governance in Malaysia.
Different competitors,
this group can be consider as best team in our class's debate,
since we are the against team,
this topic is not good for us,
it's hard to find evidence to prove that minority shareholders is ineffective in CG,
although in fact,
this is the real case.
But there is impossible to find a company's annual report stated that it always
neglected minority shareholders in a meeting.
But luckily all of our group members had actively participated in this debate,
although we are not satisfied for the result,
at least we tried our best~^^
Lastly,
I trust that
we will win them in future~^^
A very thank you to Mr.Snoopy and Hiko that specially came to support our debate.^^
Thanks for visiting my blog~^^
